AppV5 – When Application Compatibility Toolkit doesn’t work

AppV5 – When Application Compatibility Toolkit doesn’t work

/ / /

I have an application that embeds an IE window and generates a small HTML file for some content.  This application has some…..   interesting….  configuration settings that require a folder with “EVERYONE:F” permissions.  This folder cannot be in a path that contains spaces, cannot be a environment variable and the vendor recommends to put the folder on the root of the C: drive as C:TMP.  To make it more crazy, when launching the application it will generate a folder under the C:TMP that is locked to the %CLIENTNAME% (e.g., C:TMPComputerName) and every login to the application generates unique files to that session, so technically, each folder underneath TMP is unique to the user.  The vendor actually recommends completely deleting the contents of the TMP folder DAILY.

So why not just store these files in %TEMP% instead?  Great question.  If the vendor made that happen I wouldn’t have this lovely blog post.

(Just for a note this application utilized multiple folders on the root of C: as well, TMP being one, since we move our PackageInstallationRoot to a different drive, TMP isn’t available on C:)

With that all said, what am I looking to solve?

Well, I don’t want to be creating folders on the root of the C: drive as this application will be on our ‘generic’ PVS Citrix servers and minimizing the potential for pollution on the master image is a goal, having to create a folder and configure permissions is possible and I’ve done it before but it’s not very clean or elegant; really if we’re going to do that then we may as well pollute the C: drive.  We want to maintain portability so creating a C:TMP folder on the master image prevents us from publishing this package on desktops or other systems in the future unless this is well documented requirement.

We’ve just learned a new trick though, we can try using Microsoft ACT to create a file path shim that redirects the path to a different one.  So let’s do that…

The problem.

I created the shim using the steps from this post.  (C:TMP;C:ProgramDataMicrosoftAppVClientIntegrationD8E3DB68-4E48-4409-8E95-4354CC6E664BRootVFSProgramFilesX64dlc11.2TMP) I then launched the application and…

Huh.  That doesn’t look right.

And it didn’t work.  I then used procmon.exe to examine to see if it was reading the file correctly:


Procmon.exe is reporting that it IS reading that HTM file correctly.  So why isn’t it being displayed?

I ran across a similar issue on another application and what I found was that the embedded component appears to be running *outside* the bubble.  Since the shim targets applications (in this case prowin32.exe) all reads from prowin32.exe are being redirected by other processes are not.  I suspect (though I have no proof), in this case, that somehow the IE component is breaking outside the bubble and so it’s NOT getting redirected.

Can we force all programs to get redirected to the proper path?  Yes, we can.

Using symbolic links we can force any access to the directory to be redirected to the AppV package path.  AppV will then see this is a path within the ‘bubble’ and redirect *again* to your local profile where the AppV5 writes will take place.

I removed the shim and then executed:

Symbolic Link
mklink /d C:TMP C:ProgramDataMicrosoftAppVClientIntegrationD8E3DB68-4E48-4409-8E95-4354CC6E664BRootVFSProgramFilesX64dlc11.2TMP

Tracing with procmon.exe now showed us this:

And the application now displayed this:

So the application is now working without any issues, all of these ‘temp’ files are being redirected to a location where they will not be saved between sessions so no cleanup is ever needed.  We need to add the mklink.exe to the DeploymentConfig.xml.


And we are now done.


  1. Unknown 2015-11-27 7:25 pm

    Yes. The shim applies only to the targeted exe, not the rest of the VE. While you could duplicate the shim to IE as a solution (since IE wouldn't otherwise concern itself with this odd folder), sometimes the better solution can be simpler. When the file is unique to the use, I often prefer to use a start/end VE script to deal with this kind of stuff.


  2. Trentent 2015-11-29 11:16 pm

    Hi Tim,

    That's where I was getting confused. iexplore.exe wasn't loading, but it's embedded components do in the application. The only process launched *was* prowin32.exe.

    I know there are 'objects' exclusions and maybe one of them is used by this program but I didn't have enough time with the user to narrow it down more accurately.


Post a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.